[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190905073943.GA21254@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:39:43 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: tony@...mide.com, udeep.dutt@...el.com, ashutosh.dixit@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kishon@...com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtc: ds1347: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than its
implementation
On 05/09/2019 14:43:15+0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO contains if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR. It is better to
> use it directly. hence just replace it.
>
Unless you have a more significant contribution to this driver, I'm not
going to apply this patch, especially since it will have to be reverted
as soon as the probe function changes.
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
> index d392a7b..5a64eea 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
> @@ -151,10 +151,7 @@ static int ds1347_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&spi->dev, "ds1347",
> &ds1347_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
>
> - if (IS_ERR(rtc))
> - return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rtc);
> }
>
> static struct spi_driver ds1347_driver = {
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists