[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5D70C4EC.4090501@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:18:52 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: <tony@...mide.com>, <udeep.dutt@...el.com>,
<ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<kishon@...com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtc: ds1347: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than its
implementation
On 2019/9/5 15:39, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 05/09/2019 14:43:15+0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO contains if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR. It is better to
>> use it directly. hence just replace it.
>>
> Unless you have a more significant contribution to this driver, I'm not
> going to apply this patch, especially since it will have to be reverted
> as soon as the probe function changes.
Anyway, Thanks,
Sincerely,
zhong jiang
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
>> index d392a7b..5a64eea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
>> @@ -151,10 +151,7 @@ static int ds1347_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>> rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&spi->dev, "ds1347",
>> &ds1347_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
>>
>> - if (IS_ERR(rtc))
>> - return PTR_ERR(rtc);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rtc);
>> }
>>
>> static struct spi_driver ds1347_driver = {
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists