linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: remove redundant assignment to pointer log

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <190fef22-fe90-dfa0-0943-4d30b10b6b1d@broadcom.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:46:46 -0700
From:   Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: remove redundant assignment to pointer log



On 9/5/19 7:09 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The pointer log is being initialized with a value that is never read
> and is being re-assigned a little later on. The assignment is
> redundant and hence can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c
> index 44df35942a43..dcab2204c60c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c
> @@ -923,7 +923,6 @@ static int cygnus_mux_log_init(struct cygnus_pinctrl *pinctrl)
>   	if (!pinctrl->mux_log)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -	log = pinctrl->mux_log;

Yes, this indeed looks completely redundant.

>   	for (i = 0; i < CYGNUS_NUM_IOMUX_REGS; i++) {
>   		for (j = 0; j < CYGNUS_NUM_MUX_PER_REG; j++) {
>   			log = &pinctrl->mux_log[i * CYGNUS_NUM_MUX_PER_REG
> 

Change looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>