lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:46:59 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: "fs/namei.c: keep track of nd->root refcount status" causes boot
 panic

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 02:43:12PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Hi Christoph and Al Viro,
> 
> Linux next 20190904 boot PASS now.
> May i know which patch fixed this problem ?

commit 84a2bd39405ffd5fa6d6d77e408c5b9210da98de
Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue Jul 16 21:20:17 2019 -0400

    fs/namei.c: keep track of nd->root refcount status

	And I'm not going to abstain from folding the trivial fix
(LOOKUP_ROOT_GRABBED had been given the same value as LOOKUP_EMPTY)
into the commit.  Sorry.  I don't know how to tell CI systems out
there about cases like that ("earlier version of this commit used
to have a bug, fix folded in").  Something like
Supersedes: <list of sha1>
might or might not be useful for tracking; not sure.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ