linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ARM64] selftests, arm64: add kernel headers path for tags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:51:52 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Amit Kachhap <Amit.Kachhap@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ARM64] selftests, arm64: add kernel headers path for
 tags_test

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:41:00PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> tags_test.c relies on PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL/PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE being
> present in system headers. When this is not the case the build of this
> test fails with undeclared identifier errors.
> 
> Fix by providing the path to the KSFT installed kernel headers in CFLAGS.
> 
> Reported-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> Suggested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Damn, I just tagged the arm64 queue for 5.4 and didn't spot this patch.

I'll queue it at -rc1 instead, if that's ok? It doesn't look urgent.

Thanks,

Will