lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:55:22 +0200
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Amit Kachhap <Amit.Kachhap@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ARM64] selftests, arm64: add kernel headers path for tags_test

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:51 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:41:00PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > tags_test.c relies on PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL/PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE being
> > present in system headers. When this is not the case the build of this
> > test fails with undeclared identifier errors.
> >
> > Fix by providing the path to the KSFT installed kernel headers in CFLAGS.
> >
> > Reported-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> > Suggested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Damn, I just tagged the arm64 queue for 5.4 and didn't spot this patch.
>
> I'll queue it at -rc1 instead, if that's ok? It doesn't look urgent.

Sorry, I guess I should have pinged you directly.

I think it should be fine to leave it for rc1. It might cause a build
error in some kernel CI systems if they run kselftests though.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ