[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190906030158.leuumg7rwsvowwfx@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:31:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
André Roth <neolynx@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/3] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: add support for omap34xx and
omap36xx
On 05-09-19, 07:32, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [190904 08:54]:
> > This adds code and tables to read the silicon revision and
> > eFuse (speed binned / 720 MHz grade) bits for selecting
> > opp-v2 table entries.
> >
> > Since these bits are not always part of the syscon register
> > range (like for am33xx, am43, dra7), we add code to directly
> > read the register values using ioremap() if syscon access fails.
>
> This is nice :) Seems to work for me based on a quick test
> on at least omap36xx.
>
> Looks like n900 produces the following though:
>
> core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1270000 maxuV: 1270000, not supported by regulator
> cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (550000000)
That's a DT thing I believe where the voltage doesn't fit what the
regulator can support.
> But presumably that can be further patched. So for this
> patch:
>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists