[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeyN-xCktHC=Tn6yrvELswBXMmygyXJp_EmuZ-Az61kSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 19:58:07 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@...box.com>
Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Do not ioremap RAM
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 4:42 AM M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@...box.com> wrote:
>
> On a Xen-based PVH virtual machine with more than 4 GiB of RAM,
> intel_pmc_core fails initialization with the following warning message
> from the kernel, indicating that the driver is attempting to ioremap
> RAM:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> ioremap on RAM at 0x00000000fe000000 - 0x00000000fe001fff
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 434 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:186 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x2aa/0x2c0
> Modules linked in: intel_pmc_core_pltdrv(+) xen_netfront(+) intel_pmc_core \
> crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel \
> intel_rapl_perf pcspkr binfmt_misc u2mfn(O) xenfs xen_gntdev \
> xen_gntalloc xen_blkback xen_privcmd xen_evtchn ip_tables overlay \
> xen_blkfront
> CPU: 1 PID: 434 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G O 5.3.0-rc3-next-20190809-1 #2
> RIP: 0010:__ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x2aa/0x2c0
> Code: 05 0f c9 1b 01 49 09 c6 e9 8e fe ff ff 48 8d 54 24 28 48 c7 c7 68 87 0a 82 c6 05 c4 23 2b 01 01 48 8d 74 24 18 e8 d4 4a 06 00 <0f> 0b 45 31 ff e9 fe fe ff ff e8 e7 47 06 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00
> RSP: 0018:ffffc900002dfa20 EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffc0107000 RCX: 0000000000000006
> RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffff88813bb17540
> RBP: 00000000fe000000 R08: 000000000000015f R09: 000000000000000a
> R10: 000000000000000a R11: ffffc900002df8da R12: 0000000000002000
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffffffff822da3a0
> FS: 000072ecce666940(0000) GS:ffff88813bb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000785be7346d20 CR3: 000000000d872001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
> Call Trace:
> ? pmc_core_probe+0x87/0x2d0 [intel_pmc_core]
> pmc_core_probe+0x87/0x2d0 [intel_pmc_core]
> platform_drv_probe+0x35/0x80
> really_probe+0x298/0x3c0
> driver_probe_device+0x7a/0x100
> ? driver_allows_async_probing+0x50/0x50
> bus_for_each_drv+0x8f/0xd0
> __device_attach+0xf0/0x170
> bus_probe_device+0x8e/0xa0
> device_add+0x692/0x7e0
> platform_device_add+0xe9/0x240
> ? 0xffffffffc00ec000
> do_one_initcall+0x59/0x214
> do_init_module+0x5c/0x230
> load_module+0x258d/0x2840
> ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xbb/0x120
> __do_sys_finit_module+0xbb/0x120
> do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x1a0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> RIP: 0033:0x72eccf662fad
> Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ab 9e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffd3710d018 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000060ab8fda2530 RCX: 000072eccf662fad
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000072eccf2bd84d RDI: 0000000000000017
> RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007
> R10: 0000000000000017 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000072eccf2bd84d
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000060ab8fd9b5e0 R15: 0000000000000007
> ---[ end trace 5e5421608729d6f4 ]---
>
> This issue appears to manifest itself because of the following fallback
> mechanism in the driver:
>
> if (lpit_read_residency_count_address(&slp_s0_addr))
> pmcdev->base_addr = PMC_BASE_ADDR_DEFAULT;
>
> The validity of address PMC_BASE_ADDR_DEFAULT (i.e., 0xFE000000) is not
> verified by the driver, which is what this patch introduces. With this
> patch, if address PMC_BASE_ADDR_DEFAULT is in RAM, then the driver will
> not attempt to ioremap the aforementioned address.
>
Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
P.S. I cut unnecessary output off.
> Signed-off-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@...box.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> index c510d0d72475..3b6b8dcc4767 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> @@ -878,10 +878,14 @@ static int pmc_core_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (pmcdev->map == &spt_reg_map && !pci_dev_present(pmc_pci_ids))
> pmcdev->map = &cnp_reg_map;
>
> - if (lpit_read_residency_count_address(&slp_s0_addr))
> + if (lpit_read_residency_count_address(&slp_s0_addr)) {
> pmcdev->base_addr = PMC_BASE_ADDR_DEFAULT;
> - else
> +
> + if (page_is_ram(PHYS_PFN(pmcdev->base_addr)))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + } else {
> pmcdev->base_addr = slp_s0_addr - pmcdev->map->slp_s0_offset;
> + }
>
> pmcdev->regbase = ioremap(pmcdev->base_addr,
> pmcdev->map->regmap_length);
> --
> 2.21.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists