lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190908121524.49b4874d@archlinux>
Date:   Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:15:24 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] bus/ti-pwmss: move TI PWMSS driver from PWM to
 bus subsystem

On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 17:02:45 +0200
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 05:58:22PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > The TI PWMSS driver is a simple bus driver for providing power
> > power management for the PWM peripherals on TI AM33xx SoCs, namely
> > eCAP, eHRPWM and eQEP. The eQEP is a counter rather than a PWM, so
> > it does not make sense to have the bus driver in the PWM subsystem
> > since the PWMSS is not exclusive to PWM devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v3 changes:
> > - none
> > v2 changes:
> > - new patch
> > 
> >  drivers/bus/Kconfig                           | 9 +++++++++
> >  drivers/bus/Makefile                          | 1 +
> >  drivers/{pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c => bus/ti-pwmss.c} | 0
> >  drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           | 9 ---------
> >  drivers/pwm/Makefile                          | 1 -
> >  5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >  rename drivers/{pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c => bus/ti-pwmss.c} (100%)  
> 
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>

Do we need an immutable branch for these precursor patches to the
driver addition? It's not going to make 5.4 via my tree as cutting it
too fine so we'll be in the position of holding these in a non obvious
tree for a whole cycle. 

Thanks,

Jonathan


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ