linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] counter: new TI eQEP driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190908121618.3e7e5618@archlinux>
Date:   Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:16:18 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] counter: new TI eQEP driver

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:10:53 -0700
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:

> * William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com> [190905 13:38]:
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 05:58:21PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:  
> > > This series adds device tree bindings and a new counter driver for the Texas
> > > Instruments Enhanced Quadrature Encoder Pulse (eQEP).
> > > 
> > > As mentioned in one of the commit messages, to start with, the driver only
> > > supports reading the current counter value and setting the min/max values.
> > > Other features can be added as the counter subsystem gains support for them.  
> ...
> 
> > I'm satisfied with this version of the patchset.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
> > 
> > Jonathan, if you have no objections please pick up this up so that it
> > can make it to the 5.4 merge window coming in soon. Alternatively, I can
> > merge it into my repository instead and hold it for a while longer
> > there, if you prefer that route.  
> 
> Looks good to me too:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Sorry, too close to the likely opening of the 5.4 merge window for it to
go via IIO this cycle (unless there is a significant delay for some reason!)
I'm happy to queue it up for 5.5 but before I do this, see replies to patch 1
about whether an immutable branch is needed as we are going across multiple
trees.

Thanks,

Jonathan