linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Carry ima measurement log for arm64 via kexec_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:18:59 -0700
From:   prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Carry ima measurement log for arm64 via
 kexec_file_load


On 9/8/19 4:31 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Prakhar,
> "Carrying over the ima log during kexec_file_load" was originally
> posted on 5/10 and 5/31 without a cover letter. On 8/29 it was
> reposted as an RFC with a cover letter.  The cover letter was v1, but
> the patch itself was not.  In the future, please use the "git format-
> patch "-subject-prefix" option to add the version number to both the
> cover letter and the patches.
>
> The comments you received were based on the 8/29 version.  I haven't
> seen anything after that.
>
> Mimi

Added the correct subject prefix, resent patches.

I resent the patches sent at 5/31, since i had no response.

v1 version addresses the comments in the RFC patch.

I have cc-ed you to the email, hopefully its not missed again.

Thankyou for pointing it out.

Thanks,

Prakhar Srivastava