[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190910154452.GB4016@localhost>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:44:52 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PTP: introduce new versions of IOCTLs
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 10:59:39AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> case PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST:
> + case PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST2:
...
> + if (((req.perout.flags & ~PTP_PEROUT_VALID_FLAGS) ||
> + req.perout.rsv[0] || req.perout.rsv[1] ||
> + req.perout.rsv[2] || req.perout.rsv[3]) &&
> + cmd == PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST2) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
...
> +/*
> + * Bits of the ptp_perout_request.flags field:
> + */
> +#define PTP_PEROUT_VALID_FLAGS (~0)
I think you meant (0) here, or I am confused...
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists