[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrU2Wycgdfo8vLZQUnx1J9ro=6ddSkP37BhsfBkKL1mbMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:56:53 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add critical process prctl
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:53 PM Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> A task with CAP_SYS_ADMIN can mark itself PR_SET_TASK_CRITICAL,
> meaning that if the task ever exits, the kernel panics. This facility
> is intended for use by low-level core system processes that cannot
> gracefully restart without a reboot. This prctl allows these processes
> to ensure that the system restarts when they die regardless of whether
> the rest of userspace is operational.
The kind of panic produced by init crashing is awful -- logs don't get
written, etc. I'm wondering if you would be better off with a new
watchdog-like device that, when closed, kills the system in a
configurable way (e.g. after a certain amount of time, while still
logging something and having a decent chance of getting the logs
written out.) This could plausibly even be an extension to the
existing /dev/watchdog API.
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists