linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:57:39 -0700
From:   Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@....com>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support



On 9/10/2019 9:40 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> Hi,  I'm not conscientiously adding any attachments.  I think what is
>> happening is some email readers mistake the '---' to signify an attachment
>> follows.  I see the "staple" symbol on some indicating an attachment, but
>> not usually all of the email I send.  Thanks, Mike
> 
> Btw, is there anyway to fix your mail setup and not flood with your
> patchset?
> 
> I have received your V2 patchset 5(!) times yesterday and today. All
> separate submissions!
> 
> ;-(
> 

Sorry, I've been testing them and monitoring LKML to check for leakages. 
  I certainly did not intend for any of those test sends to get out. 
And I don't understand right now how they did.  I am using sendmail in 
it's basic form and you or anyone else was not on the recipient list.

(Honestly, if I had known they got out, I would have stopped testing... 
:)  But the latest ones are obviously the "official" submissions, since 
those are the copies that I also have.)  If you accept them upstream, 
I'll quit sending them, I promise... :)