linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] ARM: Add support for Realtek SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43B123F21A8CFE44A9641C099E4196FFCF8DA1D0@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:45:30 +0000
From:   James Tai[戴志峰] <james.tai@...ltek.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "jamestai.sky@...il.com" <jamestai.sky@...il.com>
CC:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Paul Burton" <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Doug Anderson" <armlinux@...isordat.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
        "Thierry Reding" <treding@...dia.com>,
        "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
        CY_Huang[黃鉦晏] <cy.huang@...ltek.com>,
        Phinex Hung <phinex@...ltek.com>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: Add support for Realtek SOC

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add support for Realtek SOC
> 
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 7:48 AM <jamestai.sky@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: "james.tai" <james.tai@...ltek.com>
> >
> > This patch adds the basic machine file for the Realtek RTD16XX
> > platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: james.tai <james.tai@...ltek.com>
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your submission! I'm glad to see interest in upstream support
> for this SoC family. I have a few small comments on details, mostly where I
> would either like to see an explanation in the patch description, or things that
> looks like they can be left out from the patch.
>
Thanks for your reply.

> > index 33b00579beff..c7c9a3662eb7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > @@ -836,6 +836,8 @@ source "arch/arm/mach-zx/Kconfig"
> >
> >  source "arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig"
> >
> > +source "arch/arm/mach-realtek/Kconfig"
> > +
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realtek/Kconfig
> b/arch/arm/mach-realtek/Kconfig
> > @@ -225,6 +226,7 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500)
> += vt8500
> >  machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_W90X900)         += w90x900
> >  machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ZX)              += zx
> >  machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQ)            += zynq
> > +machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALTEK)         += realtek
> >  machine-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR)           += spear
> >
> >  # Platform directory name.  This list is sorted alphanumerically
> 
> Please keep these lists in alphabetical order.
> 
I will keep these lists in alphabetical order in new version patch.

> >  # ARMv7-M architecture
> >  config ARCH_EFM32
> >         bool "Energy Micro efm32"
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile index
> > c3624ca6c0bc..1f0926449d47 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
> > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ endif
> >  textofs-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8X60) := 0x00208000
> >  textofs-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8960) := 0x00208000
> >  textofs-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MESON) := 0x00208000
> > +textofs-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALTEK) := 0x00208000
> >  textofs-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AXXIA) := 0x00308000
> 
> Can you explain why this is needed for your platform?
> 
We need to reserve memory (0x00000000 ~ 0x001B0000) for rom and boot code.

> >  # Machine directory name.  This list is sorted alphanumerically new
> > file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a8269964dbdb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-realtek/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only menuconfig ARCH_REALTEK
> > +       bool "Realtek SoCs"
> 
> Please add "depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7" to avoid compile time issues when
> selecting it on an earlier architecture.
> 
I will add "depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7" in new version patch.

> > +       select ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER
> > +       select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
> > +       select HAVE_SMP
> > +       select HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
> > +       select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> > +       select HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK
> > +       select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
> > +       select CLKSRC_OF
> > +       select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > +       select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> > +       select IRQ_DOMAIN
> > +       select PINCTRL
> > +       select COMMON_CLK
> > +       select ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS
> > +       select SPARSE_IRQ
> > +       select PM_OPP
> > +       select ARM_HAS_SG_CHAIN
> > +       select ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> > +       select AUTO_ZRELADDR
> > +       select MIGHT_HAVE_PCI
> > +       select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> > +       select PCI_DOMAINS if PCI
> > +       select USE_OF
> 
> Almost all of the symbols above are implied by
> ARCH_MULTI_V7 and should not be selected separately.
>
OK, I understand.

> > +config ARCH_RTD16XX
> > +       bool "Enable support for RTD1619"
> > +       depends on ARCH_REALTEK
> > +       select ARM_GIC_V3
> > +       select ARM_PSCI
> 
> As I understand, this chip uses a Cortex-A55. What is the reason for adding
> support only to the 32-bit ARM architecture rather than 64-bit?

The RTD16XX platform also support the 64-bit ARM architecture.
I will add the 64-bit ARM architecture in new version patch.

> Most 64-bit SoCs are only supported with arch/arm64, but generally speaking
> that is not a requirement. My rule of thumb is that on systems with 1GB of
> RAM or more, one would want to run a 64-bit kernel, while systems with less
> than that are better off with a 32-bit one, but that is clearly not the only reason
> for picking one over the other.
> 
Support 32-bit ARM architecture is for application compatibility.

> > +
> > +static int rtk_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct
> > +*idle) {
> > +       unsigned long entry_pa = __pa_symbol(secondary_startup);
> > +
> > +       writel_relaxed(entry_pa | (cpu << CPUID), cpu_release_virt);
> > +
> > +       arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> 
> It's very unusual to see custom smp operations on an ARMv8 system, as we
> normally use PSCI here. Can you explain what is going on here? Are you able to
> use a boot wrapper that implements these in psci instead?
>
The smp operations is porting form other Realtek platform.

Currently, The RTD16XX platform can use the PSCI method.
I will add PSCI method in new version patch.

> > +
> > +#include "platsmp.h"
> > +
> > +#define RBUS_BASE_PHYS (0x98000000)
> > +#define RBUS_BASE_VIRT (0xfe000000)
> > +#define RBUS_BASE_SIZE (0x00100000)
> > +
> > +static struct map_desc rtk_io_desc[] __initdata = {
> > +       {
> > +               .virtual = (unsigned long) IOMEM(RBUS_BASE_VIRT),
> > +               .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(RBUS_BASE_PHYS),
> > +               .length = RBUS_BASE_SIZE,
> > +               .type = MT_DEVICE,
> > +       },
> > +};
> 
> This needs a comment: Why do you require a static mapping for
> "RBUS_BASE_PHYS"? Normally device drivers should just use
> ioremap() for mapping whichever registers they want to access.
> 
The static mapping is for old Realtek devices driver.
I will 'use ioremap()' to replace with static mapping.

> > +static void __init rtk_dt_init(void)
> > +{
> > +       of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL,
> > +NULL); }
> 
> This should be taken care of by the
> of_platform_default_populate_init() and can be dropped.
> 
I will remove rtk_dt_init() in new version patch.

> > +static void __init rtk_timer_init(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
> > +       of_clk_init(NULL);
> > +#endif
> 
> COMMON_CLK is implied by ARCH_MULTI_V7, so the #ifdef can be dropped.
> 
OK, I understand.

> > +       timer_probe();
> > +       tick_setup_hrtimer_broadcast(); }
> 
> What do you need tick_setup_hrtimer_broadcast() for? I don't see any other
> platform calling this.
> 
I want to initialize the HR timer.

> > +bool __init rtk_smp_init_ops(void)
> > +{
> > +       smp_set_ops(smp_ops(rtk_smp_ops));
> > +
> > +       return true;
> > +}
> 
> I think this can also be dropped, as you set the smp_ops in the machine
> descriptor.
> 
OK, I understand.

>        Arnd
> 
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.