linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190911160404.GX13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:04:04 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...il.com>,
        Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:21:07PM +0100, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > This is correctly signed off, but Mike didn't send the patch correctly.
> > It missed a From: line for the proper author, so the patch was committed
> > as if Mike had authored it, which he didn't.
> 
> Sorry about that, haven't used the patch system for couple of years now.
> Would you like me to resubmit the patch?

No, I recommitted with the correct author.  The patch system takes
standard formatted patches (in the format you'd send to the mailing
lists, complete with the From: header in the first line of the
description, as if you're passing a patch along from someone else)
with the exception of the KernelVersion: header which needs to appear
somewhere before the patch (which can be either body or header.)

>  
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Commit
> > > 
> > >   2505b9ba9c37 ("ARM: 8904/1: skip nomap memblocks while finding the lowmem/highmem boundary")
> > > 
> > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
> 
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up