[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d7a8b2f-80e0-33bf-85f4-2de719747eeb@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:05:28 -0700
From: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@....com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS
Files
On 9/10/2019 11:04 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1596,7 +1687,7 @@ static void __init uv_system_init_hub(vo
>> uv_nmi_setup();
>> uv_cpu_init();
>> uv_scir_register_cpu_notifier();
>> - proc_mkdir("sgi_uv", NULL);
>> + uv_setup_proc_files(0);
>
> This slipped through previously: platform drivers have absolutely no
> business mucking in /proc.
>
> Please describe the hardware via sysfs as pretty much everyone else does.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
If I was doing it now I definitely would put it in the sysfs realm. The
problem is Jack did it back in (I think) 2007. The earliest commit I
could find:
commit a3d732f93785da17e0137210deadb4616f5536fc
Author: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
Date: Mon Nov 10 16:16:31 2008 -0600
x86, UV: fix redundant creation of sgi_uv
Impact: fix double entry creation in /proc
And in the past 12 years probably a hundred user programs are now keying
of the presence of /proc/sgi_uv to signal this is indeed a UV system.
Changing the location of this node also affects all the UV utilities
including those not written by us.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists