[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190911060702.GD104115@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:07:02 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@....com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86/platform/uv: Setup UV functions for Hubless UV
Systems
* Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com> wrote:
> +/* Initialize UV hubless systems */
> +static __init int uv_system_init_hubless(void)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* Setup PCH NMI handler */
> + uv_nmi_setup_hubless();
> +
> + /* Init kernel/BIOS interface */
> + rc = uv_bios_init();
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
Am I the only one who immediately sees the trivial C transformation
through which this function could lose a local variable and become 4
lines shorter?
And this function got two Reviewed-by tags...
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists