[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h85jnz5f.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:08:12 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PTP: introduce new versions of IOCTLs
Hi,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 10:59:39AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>> case PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST:
>> + case PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST2:
>
> ...
>
>> + if (((req.perout.flags & ~PTP_PEROUT_VALID_FLAGS) ||
>> + req.perout.rsv[0] || req.perout.rsv[1] ||
>> + req.perout.rsv[2] || req.perout.rsv[3]) &&
>> + cmd == PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST2) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + break;
>
> ...
>
>> +/*
>> + * Bits of the ptp_perout_request.flags field:
>> + */
>> +#define PTP_PEROUT_VALID_FLAGS (~0)
>
> I think you meant (0) here, or I am confused...
Argh. What a brain fart!
Sorry about that. I'll go fix that ASAP.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists