[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190911170140.GS2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:01:40 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:06AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() is too long, besides the fwnode
> in question does not have to be a child of device node. Let's rename it
> to devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() and keep the old name for compatibility
> for now.
>
> Also let's add a devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() wrapper as majority of the
> callers need a single GPIO.
> + return devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(dev, fwnode, con_id, 0,
> + flags, label);
At least one parameter can fit previous line, but taking into consideration
that moving second one makes it 81 character long, I would do it completely on
one line. I don't remember Linus' preferences.
> +}
> + return devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(dev, child, con_id, index,
> + flags, label);
Ditto.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists