lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190913121124.clfi46vcnrxhzmwh@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:11:24 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: crypto: Add DT bindings documentation
 for sun8i-ce Crypto Engine

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:37:17PM +0100, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:33 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >   clock-names:
> > > > >     items:
> > > > >       - const: ahb
> > > > >       - const: mod
> > > > >       - const: mbus
> > > >
> > > > And here as well
> > > >
> > > > Something I missed earlier though was that we've tried to unify as
> > > > much as possible the ahb / apb / axi clocks around the bus name, it
> > > > would be great if you could do it.
> > >
> > > I think we also want to standardize "mbus" as "dram"?
> >
> > Do we? The only user so far seems to be sun9i-de, while mbus has more
> > users. I don't really care though, both mbus and dram are pretty
> > generic to me. What makes you prefer dram over mbus?
> 
> Argh... it's actually "ram" we use the most. Both "dram" and "mbus"
> have only one instance each.

Let's use ram then :)

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ