[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40fafe93-d2dd-b1f5-bc16-cd84ff07bd13@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:41:23 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@...ive.com>,
Haotian Wang <haotian.wang@...ive.com>, <haotian.wang@...e.edu>
CC: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"wen.yang99@....com.cn" <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
"kjlu@....edu" <kjlu@....edu>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
"paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Add DMA to Linux PCI EP Framework
+ Haotian Wang
On 03/06/19 11:12 PM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:43 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>> On 31/05/19 11:46 PM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:08 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Alan,
>>>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>>
>>>> I still have to look closer into your DMA patch but linked-list mode or single
>>>> block mode shouldn't be an user select-able option but should be determined by
>>>> the size of transfer.
>>>
>>> Please consider the following when taking a closer look at this patch.
>>
>> After seeing comments from Vinod and Arnd, it looks like the better way of
>> adding DMA support would be to register DMA within PCI endpoint controller to
>> DMA subsystem (as dmaengine) and use only dmaengine APIs in pci_epf_test.
>
> Thanks Kishon. That makes it clear where these pieces should go.
>
>>> In my specific use case, I need to verify that any valid block size,
>>> including a one byte transfer, can be transferred across the PCIe bus
>>> by memcpy_toio/fromio() or by DMA either as a single block or as
>>> linked-list. That is why, instead of deciding based on transfer size,
>>> this patch introduces the '-L' flag for pcitest to communicate the
>>> user intent across the PCIe bus to pci-epf-test so the endpoint can
>>> initiate the DMA transfer using a single block or in linked-list mode.
>> The -L option seems to select an internal DMA configuration which might be
>> specific to one implementation. As Gustavo already pointed, we should have only
>> generic options in pcitest. This would no longer be applicable when we move to
>> dmaengine.
>
> Single-block DMA seemed as generic as linked-list DMA and
> memcpy_toio/fromio. It remains unclear how else to communicate that
> intent to pci_epf_test each time I invoke pcitest.
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists