linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] genirq/vfio: Introduce irq_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909161615230.1887@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:11 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
cc:     Ben Luo <luoben@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tao.ma@...ux.alibaba.com, gerry@...ux.alibaba.com,
        nanhai.zou@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] genirq/vfio: Introduce irq_update_devid() and
 optimize VFIO irq ops

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Alex Williamson wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:30:16 +0800
> Ben Luo <luoben@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
> > A friendly reminder.
> 
> The vfio patch looks ok to me.  Thomas, do you have further comments or
> a preference on how to merge these?  I'd tend to prefer the vfio
> changes through my branch for testing and can pull the irq changes with
> your approval, but we could do the reverse or split them and I could
> follow with the vfio change once the irq changes are in mainline.

I can provide you a branch, once I looked again at that stuff. It's
somewhere in that huge conference induced backlog.

Thanks,

	tglx