linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] genirq/vfio: Introduce irq_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8e7961d5-c27e-4921-45ff-af8cc8946ac3@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:12:41 +0800
From:   Ben Luo <luoben@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tao.ma@...ux.alibaba.com,
        gerry@...ux.alibaba.com, nanhai.zou@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] genirq/vfio: Introduce irq_update_devid() and
 optimize VFIO irq ops

Hi Thomas,

Could you please take a look at this again, just a friendly reminder :)

Thanks,

     Ben

在 2019/9/16 下午10:16, Thomas Gleixner 写道:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:30:16 +0800
>> Ben Luo <luoben@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A friendly reminder.
>> The vfio patch looks ok to me.  Thomas, do you have further comments or
>> a preference on how to merge these?  I'd tend to prefer the vfio
>> changes through my branch for testing and can pull the irq changes with
>> your approval, but we could do the reverse or split them and I could
>> follow with the vfio change once the irq changes are in mainline.
> I can provide you a branch, once I looked again at that stuff. It's
> somewhere in that huge conference induced backlog.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx