[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91deff5b-4a0d-a7ef-8bb2-7e7e5dad767b@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:01:40 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
noreply-spamdigest via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] block, bfq: remove bfq prefix from cgroups filenames
On 9/16/19 9:21 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
>> Il giorno 16 set 2019, alle ore 17:16, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hello, Paolo.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:07:29PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> Tejun, could you put your switch-off-io-cost code into a standalone
>>> patch, so that I can put it together with this one in a complete
>>> series?
>>
>> It was more of a proof-of-concept / example, so the note in the email
>> that the code is free to be modified / used any way you see fit. That
>> said, if you like it as it is, I can surely prep it as a standalone
>> patch.
>>
>
> AFAICT your proposal contains no evident error. Plus, no one seems to
> have complained about the idea (regardless from the exact
> implementation). So I guess the best next step is to go for it.
Not filling me with a lot of confidence that you actually tested it?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists