lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:45:03 +0200 From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, noreply-spamdigest via bfq-iosched <bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] block, bfq: remove bfq prefix from cgroups filenames > Il giorno 16 set 2019, alle ore 18:01, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> ha scritto: > > On 9/16/19 9:21 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: >> >> >>> Il giorno 16 set 2019, alle ore 17:16, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> ha scritto: >>> >>> Hello, Paolo. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:07:29PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >>>> Tejun, could you put your switch-off-io-cost code into a standalone >>>> patch, so that I can put it together with this one in a complete >>>> series? >>> >>> It was more of a proof-of-concept / example, so the note in the email >>> that the code is free to be modified / used any way you see fit. That >>> said, if you like it as it is, I can surely prep it as a standalone >>> patch. >>> >> >> AFAICT your proposal contains no evident error. Plus, no one seems to >> have complained about the idea (regardless from the exact >> implementation). So I guess the best next step is to go for it. > > Not filling me with a lot of confidence that you actually tested it? > Tested it too. Waiting for Tejun's patch to re-submit it with mine. Thanks, Paolo > -- > Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists