linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: backfire: Don't include asm/uaccess.h directly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190917071546.GA27627@sultan-box>
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:15:46 +0200
From:   Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
To:     John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        sebastian@...akpoint.cc, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: backfire: Don't include asm/uaccess.h directly

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:57:32PM +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
> But please in the future
> 1. Don't cc lkml on this
> 2. Include the maintainers in your patch

Hi,

Thanks for the sign-off. I was following the instructions listed here:
https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/communication/send_rt_patches

I couldn't find any documentation of how to send patches for rt-tests. Is there
a different set of patch submission instructions on a wiki somewhere I missed?

Thanks,
Sultan