[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190917153419.GA258455@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:34:19 -0600
From: Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] clk: Remove cached cores in parent map during unregister
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:24:14PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index c0990703ce54..f42a803fb11a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -3737,6 +3737,37 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_nodrv_ops = {
> > .set_parent = clk_nodrv_set_parent,
> > };
> >
> > +static void clk_core_evict_parent_cache_subtree(struct clk_core *root,
> > + struct clk_core *target)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct clk_core *child;
> > +
> > + if (!root)
> > + return;
>
> I don't think we need this part. Child is always a valid pointer.
>
Bjorn or Saiprakash
Are there any plans to send out Stephen's proposed patch?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists