[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da08fdaeaadd9b7b818f1b72535df94f@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 21:25:27 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] clk: Remove cached cores in parent map during unregister
On 2019-09-17 21:04, Raul Rangel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:24:14PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >
>> > ---8<---
>> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> > index c0990703ce54..f42a803fb11a 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> > @@ -3737,6 +3737,37 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_nodrv_ops = {
>> > .set_parent = clk_nodrv_set_parent,
>> > };
>> >
>> > +static void clk_core_evict_parent_cache_subtree(struct clk_core *root,
>> > + struct clk_core *target)
>> > +{
>> > + int i;
>> > + struct clk_core *child;
>> > +
>> > + if (!root)
>> > + return;
>>
>> I don't think we need this part. Child is always a valid pointer.
>>
>
> Bjorn or Saiprakash
> Are there any plans to send out Stephen's proposed patch?
>
Stephen has already sent out an updated patch for this here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190828181959.204401-1-sboyd@kernel.org/
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists