[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c24065f1-2692-9529-d505-ae639ce5d271@web.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:40:14 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3/3] i2c: qup: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource helper
> Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource helper which wraps
> platform_get_resource() and devm_ioremap_resource() together.
Can a wording like “Simplify this function implementation by using
a known wrapper function.” be nicer for this change description?
> The semantic patch that makes this report is available
> in scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource.cocci.
>
> Found using - http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
Can a tag like “Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource.cocci”
be more helpful than the other description variant?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists