linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD14+f1yP7qps9mpF1T9Xf7E5Osthzj7tH35VcWPr3TmxdkMTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:31:21 +0900
From:   Ju Hyung Park <qkrwngud825@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
Cc:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>, sj1557.seo@...sung.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linkinjeon@...il.com,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexander.levin@...rosoft.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:26 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> That differs from the original exfat code, so something is odd here.  I
> need some sort of clarification from Samsung as to when they changed the
> license in order to be able to relicense these files.

We should probably ask Valdis on what happened there.

Even the old exFAT v1.2.24 from Galaxy S7 is using "either version 2
of the License, or (at your option) any later version".
You can go check it yourself by searching "G930F" from
http://opensource.samsung.com.

I'm guessing he probably used "GPL-2.0" during his clean-up.