linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <110019.1568839603@turing-police>
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:46:43 -0400
From:   "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To:     Ju Hyung Park <qkrwngud825@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>, sj1557.seo@...sung.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linkinjeon@...il.com,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexander.levin@...rosoft.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:31:21 +0900, Ju Hyung Park said:

> We should probably ask Valdis on what happened there.
>
> Even the old exFAT v1.2.24 from Galaxy S7 is using "either version 2
> of the License, or (at your option) any later version".
> You can go check it yourself by searching "G930F" from
> http://opensource.samsung.com.
>
> I'm guessing he probably used "GPL-2.0" during his clean-up.

My  screw-up.

Original had:

/*
 *  Copyright (C) 2012-2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
 *
 *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 *  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 *  as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 *  of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

So yes, I dorked up the SPDX tags, as I didn't realize GPL-2.0-or-later
was an actual thing for those...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped