[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190918083308.GA30134@architecture4>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:33:08 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] erofs: fix return value check in
erofs_read_superblock()
Hi Yongjun,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 08:30:33AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function read_mapping_page() returns
> ERR_PTR() not NULL. The NULL test in the return value check
> should be replaced with IS_ERR().
>
> Fixes: fe7c2423570d ("erofs: use read_mapping_page instead of sb_bread")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Right... That is my mistake on recent killing bh
transformation...
I have no idea this patch could be merged for -rc1
since I don't know Greg could still accept patches
or freezed...
Since it's an error handling path and trivial, if
it's some late, could I submit this later after
erofs is merged into mainline (if it's ok) for -rc1?
(or maybe -rc2?)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> ---
> fs/erofs/super.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index caf9a95173b0..0e369494f2f2 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -105,9 +105,9 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
> int ret;
>
> page = read_mapping_page(sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 0, NULL);
> - if (!page) {
> + if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> erofs_err(sb, "cannot read erofs superblock");
> - return -EIO;
> + return PTR_ERR(page);
> }
>
> sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists