lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e65aeeb-40da-7856-a22e-ce7aac21ae46@free.fr>
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:00:32 +0200
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>
Cc:     MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] i2c: qup: Remove dev_err() log after
 platform_get_irq*() failure

On 17/09/2019 19:21, Saiyam Doshi wrote:

> The debug message after platform_get_irq() failure is redundant
> because platform_get_irq() already prints an error. Thus remove it.
> 
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> Updated changelog and removed unnecessary braces after if condition.
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> index 5519c19bfd9c..ed09a59066b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> @@ -1766,10 +1766,8 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(qup->base);
> 
>  	qup->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (qup->irq < 0) {
> -		dev_err(qup->dev, "No IRQ defined\n");
> +	if (qup->irq < 0)
>  		return qup->irq;
> -	}

As far as I understand, platform_get_irq() == 0 is also an error condition.

I think the typical way to handle this peculiarity is:
(Maybe the IRQ maintainers will correct me)

	qup->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
	if (qup->irq <= 0)
		return qup->irq ? : -ENXIO;

Regards.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ