[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190918110517.GD2908@khorivan>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:05:18 +0300
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/14] libbpf: makefile: add C/CXX/LDFLAGS to
libbpf.so and test_libpf targets
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:19:22PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:00 AM Ivan Khoronzhuk
><ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> In case of LDFLAGS and EXTRA_CC/CXX flags there is no way to pass them
>> correctly to build command, for instance when --sysroot is used or
>> external libraries are used, like -lelf, wich can be absent in
>> toolchain. This can be used for samples/bpf cross-compiling allowing
>> to get elf lib from sysroot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
>> index c6f94cffe06e..bccfa556ef4e 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ else
>> CFLAGS := -g -Wall
>> endif
>>
>> +ifdef EXTRA_CXXFLAGS
>> + CXXFLAGS := $(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS)
>> +endif
>> +
>> ifeq ($(feature-libelf-mmap), 1)
>> override CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBELF_MMAP_SUPPORT
>> endif
>> @@ -176,8 +180,9 @@ $(BPF_IN): force elfdep bpfdep
>> $(OUTPUT)libbpf.so: $(OUTPUT)libbpf.so.$(LIBBPF_VERSION)
>>
>> $(OUTPUT)libbpf.so.$(LIBBPF_VERSION): $(BPF_IN)
>> - $(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) --shared -Wl,-soname,libbpf.so.$(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION) \
>> - -Wl,--version-script=$(VERSION_SCRIPT) $^ -lelf -o $@
>> + $(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) \
>> + --shared -Wl,-soname,libbpf.so.$(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION) \
>> + -Wl,--version-script=$(VERSION_SCRIPT) $^ -lelf -o $@
>> @ln -sf $(@F) $(OUTPUT)libbpf.so
>> @ln -sf $(@F) $(OUTPUT)libbpf.so.$(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION)
>>
>> @@ -185,7 +190,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)libbpf.a: $(BPF_IN)
>> $(QUIET_LINK)$(RM) $@; $(AR) rcs $@ $^
>>
>> $(OUTPUT)test_libbpf: test_libbpf.cpp $(OUTPUT)libbpf.a
>> - $(QUIET_LINK)$(CXX) $(INCLUDES) $^ -lelf -o $@
>> + $(QUIET_LINK)$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) $^ -lelf -o $@
>
>Instead of doing ifdef EXTRA_CXXFLAGS bit above, you can just include
>both $(CXXFLAGS) and $(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS), which will do the right thing
>(and is actually recommended my make documentation way to do this).
It's good practice to follow existent style, I've done similar way as for
CFLAGS + EXTRACFLAGS here, didn't want to verify it can impact on
smth else. And my goal is not to correct everything but embed my
functionality, series tool large w/o it.
>
>But actually, there is no need to use C++ compiler here,
>test_libbpf.cpp can just be plain C. Do you mind renaming it to .c and
>using C compiler instead?
Seems like, will try in next v.
>
>>
>> $(OUTPUT)libbpf.pc:
>> $(QUIET_GEN)sed -e "s|@...FIX@|$(prefix)|" \
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists