[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfFS5bA_OK4Zw_2e3T2MEuNETdcBMLMhGRHC-_UYvsLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:07:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: Convert Exynos System
Registers bindings to json-schema
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 14:36, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 11:20:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Convert Samsung Exynos System Registers (SYSREG) bindings to DT schema
> > format using json-schema.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Example somehow fails:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.example.dt.yaml:
> > system-controller@...40000: compatible:0: 'samsung,exynos5250-pmu' is
> > not one of ['samsung,exynos4-sysreg', 'samsung,exynos5-sysreg']
> >
> > It seems that PMU schema is applied to sysreq nodes (and vice-versa).
> > ---
> > .../bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt | 19 -----------
> > .../bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 4fced6e9d5e4..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
> > -SAMSUNG S5P/Exynos SoC series System Registers (SYSREG)
> > -
> > -Properties:
> > - - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list:
> > - - "samsung,exynos4-sysreg" - for Exynos4 based SoCs,
> > - - "samsung,exynos5-sysreg" - for Exynos5 based SoCs.
> > - second value must be always "syscon".
> > - - reg : offset and length of the register set.
> > -
> > -Example:
> > - syscon@...10000 {
> > - compatible = "samsung,exynos4-sysreg", "syscon";
> > - reg = <0x10010000 0x400>;
> > - };
> > -
> > - syscon@...50000 {
> > - compatible = "samsung,exynos5-sysreg", "syscon";
> > - reg = <0x10050000 0x5000>;
> > - };
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a3d44646e441
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Samsung S5P/Exynos SoC series System Registers (SYSREG)
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - samsung,exynos4-sysreg
> > + - samsung,exynos5-sysreg
> > + - const: syscon
>
> The problem is this will by default match any node with 'syscon'. You
> have to add a custom 'select' entry. See the LVDS panel bindings for an
> example.
>
> I'd like to kill off 'syscon'...
I see that panels use empty {} match but some other examples use
custom select. The panel approach in my case does not actually check
whether last compatible is syscon. I'll go then with a separate select
approach.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists