lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCDv2m_0tP+rdT1tgXhMs-hPE_cJ9TmO8h9ftDvJXvby+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:03:38 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        Zhiqiang Liang <zhiqiang.liang@...ogic.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
        Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
        Victor Wan <victor.wan@...ogic.com>,
        Xingyu Chen <xingyu.chen@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: amlogic: Add support for Secure power domains controller

Hi Jianxin,

I added three comments below from a quick glance at this driver (I
didn't have time for a complete review)

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com> wrote:
[...]
> +               pm_genpd_init(&dom->base, NULL,
> +                             (match->domains[i].get_power ?
> +                             match->domains[i].get_power(dom) : true));
.get_power is never NULL in this driver so the ": true" part is
effectively a no-op

[...]
> +static const struct of_device_id meson_secure_pwrc_match_table[] = {
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "amlogic,meson-a1-pwrc",
> +               .data = &meson_secure_a1_pwrc_data,
> +       },
> +       { }
many drivers use a /* sentinel */ comment inside { }

[...]
> +arch_initcall_sync(meson_secure_pwrc_init);
why arch_initcall_sync instead of builtin_platform_driver?
$ grep -R arch_initcall_sync drivers/soc/
$


Martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ