linux-kernel - [PATCH] powerpc:mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190920084540.3449-1-lei.xu@nxp.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:45:40 +0800
From:   Lei Xu <lei.xu@....com>
To:     linux-devel@...ux.nxdi.nxp.com,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lei Xu <lei.xu@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc:mark expected switch fall-throughs

When building kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and -Werror, it
reported the follwoing errors:

arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c: In function ‘emulate_spe’:
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:178:8: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
    ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[3], p++);
        ^~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:179:3: note: here
   case 4:
   ^~~~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:181:8: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
    ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[5], p++);
        ^~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:182:3: note: here
   case 2:
   ^~~~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:261:8: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
    ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[3], p++);
        ^~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:262:3: note: here
   case 4:
   ^~~~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:264:8: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
    ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[5], p++);
        ^~
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c:265:3: note: here
   case 2:
   ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

This patch fixs the above errors.

Signed-off-by: Lei Xu <lei.xu@....com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
index 7107ad8..92045ed 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
@@ -176,9 +176,11 @@ static int emulate_spe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int reg,
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[1], p++);
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[2], p++);
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[3], p++);
+			/* fall through */
 		case 4:
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[4], p++);
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[5], p++);
+			/* fall through */
 		case 2:
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[6], p++);
 			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[7], p++);
@@ -259,9 +261,11 @@ static int emulate_spe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int reg,
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[1], p++);
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[2], p++);
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[3], p++);
+			/* fall through */
 		case 4:
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[4], p++);
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[5], p++);
+			/* fall through */
 		case 2:
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[6], p++);
 			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[7], p++);
-- 
2.9.3