linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:03:33 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using
 fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 02:12:28AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> (CC'ing Heikki as the original author of software nodes support)
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
> 
> s/bit/but/
> 
> > works with arbitrary firmware node.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> 
> On a side note, as I'm not very familiar with software nodes, I tried to
> see how they are to be used, and it seems they are completely
> undocumented :-( Heikki, is this something that could be fixed ?

OK. I'll start writing API documentation for it.

thanks,

-- 
heikki