[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190923160045.GE5056@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:00:45 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using
fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Hi Heikki,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:03:33PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 02:12:28AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > (CC'ing Heikki as the original author of software nodes support)
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> > > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
> >
> > s/bit/but/
> >
> > > works with arbitrary firmware node.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> >
> > On a side note, as I'm not very familiar with software nodes, I tried to
> > see how they are to be used, and it seems they are completely
> > undocumented :-( Heikki, is this something that could be fixed ?
>
> OK. I'll start writing API documentation for it.
That's great, thanks ! I'll do my best to review it if you CC me.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists