[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190923170557.mggr5gcov43pcmfs@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:05:57 -0500
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 5/7] media: i2c: ov2659: Add powerdown/reset gpio
handling
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote on Mon [2019-Sep-23 09:17:32 +0300]:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:55:29AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> ...
> > > > @@ -1400,6 +1440,18 @@ static int ov2659_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > ov2659->xvclk_frequency > 27000000)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > + /* Optional gpio don't fail if not present */
> > > > + ov2659->pwdn_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "powerdown",
> > > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(ov2659->pwdn_gpio))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(ov2659->pwdn_gpio);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Optional gpio don't fail if not present */
> > > > + ov2659->resetb_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset",
> > > > + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(ov2659->resetb_gpio))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(ov2659->resetb_gpio);
> > > > +
> > > > v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(&ov2659->ctrls, 2);
> > > > ov2659->link_frequency =
> > > > v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&ov2659->ctrls, &ov2659_ctrl_ops,
> > > > @@ -1445,6 +1497,9 @@ static int ov2659_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > ov2659->frame_size = &ov2659_framesizes[2];
> > > > ov2659->format_ctrl_regs = ov2659_formats[0].format_ctrl_regs;
> > > >
> > > > + pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev);
> > > > + pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->dev);
> > >
> > > This makes the driver depend on runtime PM.
> >
> > Obviously.
> > Why? Is that bad?
>
> Well, if it is, then it should be listed in driver's dependencies in
> Kconfig.
And I see that most camera driver using pm_runtime calls don't mark it as a
dependency in their own Kconfig. There is actually only one that does.
>
> >
> > >
> > > See e.g. the smiapp driver for an example how to make it work without. It
> > > wasn't trivial. :I You won't need autosuspend.
> >
> > I took a look at that driver, but I don't get your reference to being able
> > to work without runtime pm!
>
> The driver didn't need runtime PM, so it'd be nice to continue work
> without.
Ok.
>
> What smiapp does is that it powers the sensor on first *without* runtime
> PM, and then proceeds to set up runtime PM if it's available. The sensor
> will only be powered off when the device is unbound with runtime PM
> disabled.
In that case in your original reply you suggested that I move the content
of ov2659_set_power() into the pm_runtime callback, but based on this
comments then I should keep ov2659_set_power() as is as I would need to
use it for this specific purpose.
>
> Regarding the smiapp driver, you can replace pm_runtime_get_noresume() and
> all the autoidle lines with pm_runtime_idle() call after
> pm_runtime_enable() in the ov2659 driver.
Ok, I'll study this mechanics a little more, as this is not immediately
clear.
Benoit
>
> > That driver looks pretty similar to ov7740.c which I used as a reference
> > for this.
>
> I guess in practice many sensor drivers don't work without it on DT-based
> systems I'm afraid. :-( They should be fixed.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists