lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45ad0ec1bfd5af4f46efd7d24c627822ac17fdbf.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:00:58 +0200
From:   Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@....com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: imx8mq: add DCSS node

Am Montag, den 23.09.2019, 13:12 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> Hi Laurentiu,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:14 AM Laurentiu Palcu
> <laurentiu.palcu@....com> wrote:
> 
> > +
> > +                       dcss: dcss@...2e00000 {
> 
> Node names should be generic, so:
> 
> dcss: display-controller@...00000
> 
> > +                               #address-cells = <1>;
> > +                               #size-cells = <0>;
> > +                               compatible = "nxp,imx8mq-dcss";
> > +                               reg = <0x32e00000 0x2D000>,
> > <0x32e2f000 0x1000>;
> 
> 0x2d000 for consistency.
> 
> > +                               interrupts = <6>, <8>, <9>;
> 
> The interrupts are passed in the <GIC_SPI xxx IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>
> format.

No, they are not. Those are imx-irqsteer IRQs, this controller has 0
irq cells, so the description in this patch is correct.

Regards,
Lucas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ