[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190924143600.GY23050@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:36:00 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU <mcirjaliu@...defender.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab, memcontrol: undefined reference to
`memcg_kmem_get_cache'
On Tue 24-09-19 14:08:33, Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU wrote:
> > On Tue 24-09-19 08:46:48, Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU wrote:
> > > Having CONFIG_MEMCG turned off causes these issues:
> > > mm/slub.o: In function `slab_pre_alloc_hook':
> > > /home/mircea/build/mm/slab.h:425: undefined reference to
> > `memcg_kmem_get_cache'
> > > mm/slub.o: In function `slab_post_alloc_hook':
> > > /home/mircea/build/mm/slab.h:444: undefined reference to
> > `memcg_kmem_put_cache'
> >
> > You should be adding your Sign-off-by to every patch you post to the kernel
> > mailing list (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches).
> >
> > It is also really important to mention which tree does this apply to and ideally
> > also note which change has broken the code. In this particular case I have
> > tried the current Linus tree (4c07e2ddab5b) and $ grep
> > 'CONFIG_SLUB\|CONFIG_MEMCG' .config # CONFIG_MEMCG is not set
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y CONFIG_SLUB=y CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL=y
> > # CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is not set # CONFIG_SLUB_STATS is not set
> >
> > which means CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not enabled as well. And the
> > compilation succeeds. What is your config file?
>
> The config file is not the problem (figured it out).
> I am lowering the optimization level on certain files for debug purposes.
> In my case: CFLAGS_slub.o += -O1 -fno-inline
>
> The code which causes the problem looks like this:
> static inline struct kmem_cache *slab_pre_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> gfp_t flags)
> {
> ...
>
> if (memcg_kmem_enabled() &&
> ((flags & __GFP_ACCOUNT) || (s->flags & SLAB_ACCOUNT)))
> return memcg_kmem_get_cache(s);
>
> ...
> }
>
> Under normal circumstances memcg_kmem_enabled() returns false and the
> statement is evaluated as unreachable and removed entirely.
> It seems -O1 keeps the call to memcg_kmem_get_cache().
OK, this makes more sense now. Is it the only problem to make your
kernel compile with O1? We do rely on dead code elimination quite
heavily. I do not think we want add a lot of code for something that we
are unlikely to be able to support. This particular patch is quite small
but I am not really supper happy to add more boilerplate code...
> The change that introduced this is here:
> commit 452647784b2fccfdeeb976f6f842c6719fb2daac
> Author: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
> Date: Tue Jul 26 15:24:21 2016 -0700
> Although I had the same problem before with other header files.
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists