linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] media: imx214: Add new control with V4L2_CID_UNIT_CELL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190925092552.okhiq5nweujjuk7q@uno.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:25:52 +0200
From:   Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
To:     Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@...alda.com>
Cc:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] media: imx214: Add new control with
 V4L2_CID_UNIT_CELL_SIZE

Hi Ricardo,

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:51:37PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@...nel.org>
>
> According to the product brief, the unit cell size is 1120 nanometers^2.
>
> https://www.sony-semicon.co.jp/products_en/IS/sensor1/img/products/ProductBrief_IMX214_20150428.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
> index 159a3a604f0e..57562e20c4ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct imx214 {
>  	struct v4l2_ctrl *pixel_rate;
>  	struct v4l2_ctrl *link_freq;
>  	struct v4l2_ctrl *exposure;
> +	struct v4l2_ctrl *unit_size;
>
>  	struct regulator_bulk_data	supplies[IMX214_NUM_SUPPLIES];
>
> @@ -948,6 +949,13 @@ static int imx214_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	static const s64 link_freq[] = {
>  		IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ,
>  	};
> +	struct v4l2_area unit_size = {
> +		.width = 1120,
> +		.height = 1120,
> +	};
> +	union v4l2_ctrl_ptr p_def = {
> +		.p_area = &unit_size,
> +	};
>  	int ret;
>
>  	ret = imx214_parse_fwnode(dev);
> @@ -1029,6 +1037,10 @@ static int imx214_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  					     V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE,
>  					     0, 3184, 1, 0x0c70);
>
> +	imx214->unit_size = v4l2_ctrl_new_std_compound(&imx214->ctrls,
> +						       NULL,
> +						       V4L2_CID_UNIT_CELL_SIZE,
> +						       p_def);
>  	ret = imx214->ctrls.error;
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "%s control init failed (%d)\n",

Would something like this scale? I'm a bit bothered by the need of
declaring v4l2_ctrl_ptr structure just to set a field there in
drivers.

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
index 57562e20c4ca..a00d8fa481c2 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
@@ -953,9 +953,6 @@ static int imx214_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
                .width = 1120,
                .height = 1120,
        };
-       union v4l2_ctrl_ptr p_def = {
-               .p_area = &unit_size,
-       };
        int ret;

        ret = imx214_parse_fwnode(dev);
@@ -1040,7 +1037,7 @@ static int imx214_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
        imx214->unit_size = v4l2_ctrl_new_std_compound(&imx214->ctrls,
                                                       NULL,
                                                       V4L2_CID_UNIT_CELL_SIZE,
-                                                      p_def);
+                                                      &unit_size);
        ret = imx214->ctrls.error;
        if (ret) {
                dev_err(&client->dev, "%s control init failed (%d)\n",
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
index f626f9983408..4a2648bee6f5 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
@@ -2681,18 +2681,26 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu_items);
 /* Helper function for standard compound controls */
 struct v4l2_ctrl *v4l2_ctrl_new_std_compound(struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl,
                                const struct v4l2_ctrl_ops *ops, u32 id,
-                               const union v4l2_ctrl_ptr p_def)
+                               void *defval)
 {
        const char *name;
        enum v4l2_ctrl_type type;
        u32 flags;
        s64 min, max, step, def;
+       union v4l2_ctrl_ptr p_def;

        v4l2_ctrl_fill(id, &name, &type, &min, &max, &step, &def, &flags);
        if (type < V4L2_CTRL_COMPOUND_TYPES) {
                handler_set_err(hdl, -EINVAL);
                return NULL;
        }
+
+       switch ((u32)type) {
+       case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_AREA:
+               p_def.p_area = defval;
+               break;
+       }
+
        return v4l2_ctrl_new(hdl, ops, NULL, id, name, type,
                             min, max, step, def, NULL, 0,
                             flags, NULL, NULL, p_def, NULL);

However, due to my limitied understanding of the control framework, I
cannot tell how many cases the newly introduced switch should
handle...

> --
> 2.23.0
>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)