linux-kernel - [PATCH] proc: change ->nlink under proc_subdir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190925202436.GA17388@avx2>
Date:   Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:24:36 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] proc: change ->nlink under proc_subdir_lock

Currently gluing PDE into global /proc tree is done under lock,
but changing ->nlink is not. Additionally struct proc_dir_entry::nlink
is not atomic so updates can be lost.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
---

 fs/proc/generic.c |   31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -138,8 +138,12 @@ static int proc_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
 {
 	struct inode *inode = d_inode(path->dentry);
 	struct proc_dir_entry *de = PDE(inode);
-	if (de && de->nlink)
-		set_nlink(inode, de->nlink);
+	if (de) {
+		nlink_t nlink = READ_ONCE(de->nlink);
+		if (nlink > 0) {
+			set_nlink(inode, nlink);
+		}
+	}
 
 	generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
 	return 0;
@@ -362,6 +366,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_register(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
 		write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
 		goto out_free_inum;
 	}
+	dir->nlink++;
 	write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
 
 	return dp;
@@ -472,10 +477,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_mkdir_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
 		ent->data = data;
 		ent->proc_fops = &proc_dir_operations;
 		ent->proc_iops = &proc_dir_inode_operations;
-		parent->nlink++;
 		ent = proc_register(parent, ent);
-		if (!ent)
-			parent->nlink--;
 	}
 	return ent;
 }
@@ -505,10 +507,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_mount_point(const char *name)
 		ent->data = NULL;
 		ent->proc_fops = NULL;
 		ent->proc_iops = NULL;
-		parent->nlink++;
 		ent = proc_register(parent, ent);
-		if (!ent)
-			parent->nlink--;
 	}
 	return ent;
 }
@@ -666,8 +665,12 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
 	len = strlen(fn);
 
 	de = pde_subdir_find(parent, fn, len);
-	if (de)
+	if (de) {
 		rb_erase(&de->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
+		if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+			parent->nlink--;
+		}
+	}
 	write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
 	if (!de) {
 		WARN(1, "name '%s'\n", name);
@@ -676,9 +679,6 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
 
 	proc_entry_rundown(de);
 
-	if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
-		parent->nlink--;
-	de->nlink = 0;
 	WARN(pde_subdir_first(de),
 	     "%s: removing non-empty directory '%s/%s', leaking at least '%s'\n",
 	     __func__, de->parent->name, de->name, pde_subdir_first(de)->name);
@@ -714,13 +714,12 @@ int remove_proc_subtree(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
 			de = next;
 			continue;
 		}
-		write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
-
-		proc_entry_rundown(de);
 		next = de->parent;
 		if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
 			next->nlink--;
-		de->nlink = 0;
+		write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
+
+		proc_entry_rundown(de);
 		if (de == root)
 			break;
 		pde_put(de);