[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea06c6bb-c6ff-ef34-55ca-c58cb77ed39e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:25:21 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: LAPIC: Loose fluctuation filter for auto tune
lapic_timer_advance_ns
On 26/09/19 02:54, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN 100
> -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MAX 5000
> -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_INIT 1000
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_EXPIRE_MIN 100
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_EXPIRE_MAX 10000
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_INIT 1000
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_MAX 5000
I think the old #define value is good. What about:
-#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN 100
-#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MAX 5000
-#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_INIT 1000
+#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN 100 /* clock cycles */
+#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MAX 10000 /* clock cycles */
+#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_INIT 1000
+#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_MAX 5000
?
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists