[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CySCXpn=CUnfUYf+r4aAFOOVscryLQqDnYhTstb4Hv=Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:34:26 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: LAPIC: Loose fluctuation filter for auto tune lapic_timer_advance_ns
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 18:25, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/09/19 02:54, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN 100
> > -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MAX 5000
> > -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_INIT 1000
> > +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_EXPIRE_MIN 100
> > +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_EXPIRE_MAX 10000
> > +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_INIT 1000
> > +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_MAX 5000
>
> I think the old #define value is good. What about:
>
> -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN 100
> -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MAX 5000
> -#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_INIT 1000
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN 100 /* clock cycles */
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MAX 10000 /* clock cycles */
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_INIT 1000
> +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_NS_MAX 5000
Looks good, I guess you can update the patch during apply. :)
Wanpeng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists