[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190926192603.18647-2-gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:25:59 -0700
From: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
To: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com, dvhart@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, charles.d.prestopine@...el.com,
Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
"David E . Box" <david.e.box@...el.com>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] x86/intel_pmc_core: Clean up: Remove comma after the termination line
It is common practice to place a comma after the last entry in an
initialized array to avoid the need to add one in future patches that
extend the array. But when the last element is a termination marker, the
comma could be harmful. Any new entries must be added before the
terminator (and the comma would prevent the compiler from issuing a
warning about an entry after the terminator).
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: David E. Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
index 94a008efb09b..6ad829915689 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static const struct pmc_bit_map spt_pll_map[] = {
{"GEN2 USB2PCIE2 PLL", SPT_PMC_BIT_MPHY_CMN_LANE1},
{"DMIPCIE3 PLL", SPT_PMC_BIT_MPHY_CMN_LANE2},
{"SATA PLL", SPT_PMC_BIT_MPHY_CMN_LANE3},
- {},
+ {}
};
static const struct pmc_bit_map spt_mphy_map[] = {
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static const struct pmc_bit_map spt_mphy_map[] = {
{"MPHY CORE LANE 13", SPT_PMC_BIT_MPHY_LANE13},
{"MPHY CORE LANE 14", SPT_PMC_BIT_MPHY_LANE14},
{"MPHY CORE LANE 15", SPT_PMC_BIT_MPHY_LANE15},
- {},
+ {}
};
static const struct pmc_bit_map spt_pfear_map[] = {
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static const struct pmc_bit_map spt_pfear_map[] = {
{"CSME_SMS1", SPT_PMC_BIT_CSME_SMS1},
{"CSME_RTC", SPT_PMC_BIT_CSME_RTC},
{"CSME_PSF", SPT_PMC_BIT_CSME_PSF},
- {},
+ {}
};
static const struct pmc_bit_map spt_ltr_show_map[] = {
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct pmc_bit_map *cnp_slps0_dbg_maps[] = {
cnp_slps0_dbg0_map,
cnp_slps0_dbg1_map,
cnp_slps0_dbg2_map,
- NULL,
+ NULL
};
static const struct pmc_bit_map cnp_ltr_show_map[] = {
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_pmc_core_ids);
static const struct pci_device_id pmc_pci_ids[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, SPT_PMC_PCI_DEVICE_ID), 0},
- { 0, },
+ { 0, }
};
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists