[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <350F3734-FB0F-4D71-92FD-59EEAF9CCB0B@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:18:42 -0700
From: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...ux.intel.com>
To: Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/3] i915: convert all irq_locks spinlocks to
raw spinlocks
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I'm running v5.2.17-rt9 now and have not seen any i915 related splats. I think we're good to drop my patches
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:29 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2019-09-16 14:21:22 [-0700], Sean V Kelley wrote:
> > I’ve tested this also on the v5.2.14-rt7 and can confirm that it avoids the need for making the locks raw.
> >
> > Tested-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Good. I went for an alternative approach in v5.2.17-rt9. Now I believe
> that the three here are obsolete. If not, please give a sign.
Confirmed as well..
Sean
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sean
>
> Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists