linux-kernel - Re: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/3] i915: convert all irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:18:42 -0700
From:   Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/3] i915: convert all irq_locks spinlocks to
 raw spinlocks



> On Sep 27, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm running v5.2.17-rt9 now and have not seen any i915 related splats. I think we're good to drop my patches
> 
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:29 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2019-09-16 14:21:22 [-0700], Sean V Kelley wrote:
> > I’ve tested this also on the v5.2.14-rt7 and can confirm that it avoids the need for making the locks raw.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Good. I went for an alternative approach in v5.2.17-rt9. Now I believe
> that the three here are obsolete. If not, please give a sign.

Confirmed as well..

Sean

> 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Sean
> 
> Sebastian