Message-ID: <74acedc9-016e-4c39-ebb4-5572e6b94305@baylibre.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:20:36 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:     Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, daniel@...ll.ch,
        airlied@...ux.ie,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
Subject: Re: drm_sched with panfrost crash on T820

On 27/09/2019 17:00, Steven Price wrote:
> On 27/09/2019 12:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27/09/2019 13:27, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Hi Steven,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your prompt reaction !
>>>
>>> On 27/09/2019 12:48, Steven Price wrote:
>>>> On 27/09/2019 10:55, Steven Price wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> One obvious issue with the DRM scheduler is that there is a call to
>>>>> cancel_delayed_work() in drm_sched_stop() which to me looks like it
>>>>> should be cancel_delayed_work_sync() to ensure that the timeout handling
>>>>> has completed.
>>>>>
>>>>> However in the above scenario a _sync() variety would then cause a
>>>>> deadlock (one thread has pfdev->reset_lock and is waiting for the other
>>>>> thread which is trying to take the lock).
>>>>>
>>>>> So we need to update Panfrost so that it can coordinate the reset
>>>>> between schedulers. Can you try something like the following (untested):
>>>>
>>>> And actually testing it I of course discover it doesn't quite work. We
>>>> do need the cancel_delayed_work_sync() in the DRM scheduler (when
>>>> stopping a different scheduler) and we need to avoid holding the
>>>> reset_lock during the drm_sched_stop() call to prevent deadlocking with
>>>> another thread handling a timeout.
>>>
>>> Yep the first patch wasn't fixing the issue all the time.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you give the following patch a spin? I don't have a great
>>>> reproduction case, so it would be good to get some confidence it fixes
>>>> the problem.
>>>
>>> Running it right now.
>>
>> First run gave me (while applying on v5.3):
>> [  307.969230] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000c0
>> [...]
>> [  308.029358] Hardware name: Khadas VIM2 (DT)
>> [  308.033510] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout
>> [  308.038416] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
>> [  308.043160] pc : drm_sched_start+0x88/0x138
>> [  308.047300] lr : drm_sched_start+0xb0/0x138
>> [...]
>> [  308.133635] Call trace:
>> [  308.136052]  drm_sched_start+0x88/0x138
>> [  308.139847]  panfrost_job_timedout+0x1cc/0x208
>> [  308.144245]  drm_sched_job_timedout+0x44/0xa8
>> [  308.148560]  process_one_work+0x1e0/0x320
>> [  308.152524]  worker_thread+0x40/0x450
>> [  308.156149]  kthread+0x124/0x128
>> [  308.159342]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>> [  308.162879] Code: 54000280 f9400862 52800020 aa1a03e1 (f940605b)
>> [  308.168914] ---[ end trace 256b7f5faec101d2 ]---
>>
>> Bad pointer seems to be struct dma_fence *fence = s_job->s_fence->parent that
>> could be a NULL return from panfrost_job_run().
> 
> I haven't managed reproduce this locally, admittedly the test case I was
> using before relies on changes in drm-misc-next (HEAPs specifically), so
> it might be a bug present in v5.3 which isn't present in drm-misc-next.

I have a hard time reproducing it... anyway the original regression
doesn't happen anymore.

I'll continue running it a few times this week-end.

Thanks,
Neil

> 
> From the code dumped we have:
> 
>    0:	54000280 	b.eq	50 <.text+0x50>  // b.none
>    4:	f9400862 	ldr	x2, [x3, #16]
>    8:	52800020 	mov	w0, #0x1                   	// #1
>    c:	aa1a03e1 	mov	x1, x26
>   10:	f940605b 	ldr	x27, [x2, #192]
> 
> Which looks like the expression s_job->s_fence->parent, so it looks like
> s_job->s_fence == NULL. Which looks to me like drm_sched_job_cleanup()
> has been called on the job. But I can't work out why.
> 
> Steve
> 
>> Neil
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----8<----
>>>> From 521a286789260197ae94f698932ebf369efc45ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:42:40 +0100
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Handle resetting on timeout better
>>>>
>>>> Panfrost uses multiple schedulers (one for each slot, so 2 in reality),
>>>> and on a timeout has to stop all the schedulers to safely perform a
>>>> reset. However more than one scheduler can trigger a timeout at the same
>>>> time. This race condition results in jobs being freed while they are
>>>> still in use.
>>>>
>>>> Modify drm_sched_stop() to call cancel_delayed_work_sync() when stopping
>>>> a different scheduler to the one belonging to the passed in job.
>>>> panfrost_job_timedout() is also modified to only allow one thread at a
>>>> time to handle the reset. Any subsequent threads simply return assuming
>>>> that the first thread will handle the situation.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h |  2 ++
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c    | 11 ++++++++++-
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c     |  5 ++++-
>>>>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h
>>>> index f503c566e99f..6441c7fba6c4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h
>>>> @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ struct panfrost_device {
>>>>  		unsigned long cur_volt;
>>>>  		struct panfrost_devfreq_slot slot[NUM_JOB_SLOTS];
>>>>  	} devfreq;
>>>> +
>>>> +	bool is_resetting;
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>>  struct panfrost_mmu {
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>>>> index 05c85f45a0de..1b2019e08b43 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>>>> @@ -388,13 +388,21 @@ static void panfrost_job_timedout(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
>>>>  
>>>>  	mutex_lock(&pfdev->reset_lock);
>>>>  
>>>> +	if (pfdev->is_resetting) {
>>>> +		mutex_unlock(&pfdev->reset_lock);
>>>> +		return;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +	pfdev->is_resetting = true;
>>>> +
>>>> +	mutex_unlock(&pfdev->reset_lock);
>>>> +
>>>>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++)
>>>>  		drm_sched_stop(&pfdev->js->queue[i].sched, sched_job);
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (sched_job)
>>>>  		drm_sched_increase_karma(sched_job);
>>>>  
>>>> -	/* panfrost_core_dump(pfdev); */
>>>> +	mutex_lock(&pfdev->reset_lock);
>>>>  
>>>>  	panfrost_devfreq_record_transition(pfdev, js);
>>>>  	panfrost_device_reset(pfdev);
>>>> @@ -406,6 +414,7 @@ static void panfrost_job_timedout(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
>>>>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++)
>>>>  		drm_sched_start(&pfdev->js->queue[i].sched, true);
>>>>  
>>>> +	pfdev->is_resetting = false;
>>>>  	mutex_unlock(&pfdev->reset_lock);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> index 148468447ba9..bc6d1862ec8a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> @@ -415,7 +415,10 @@ void drm_sched_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, struct drm_sched_job *bad)
>>>>  	 * this TDR finished and before the newly restarted jobs had a
>>>>  	 * chance to complete.
>>>>  	 */
>>>> -	cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>> +	if (bad->sched != sched)
>>>> +		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>> +	else
>>>> +		cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_stop);
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists